Comments on: Type safety in Java Set and Map http://www.javablogging.com/type_safety_in_java_set_and_map/ Tracking surprises, features and bugs Wed, 21 Jul 2010 14:19:17 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8 hourly 1 By: vibram five fingers kso shoes http://www.javablogging.com/type_safety_in_java_set_and_map/comment-page-1/#comment-3170 vibram five fingers kso shoes Sat, 03 Jul 2010 02:40:41 +0000 http://www.javablogging.com/?p=3#comment-3170 Women's <a href="http://www.vibramfivefingers.name" rel="nofollow"><strong>vibram five fingers kso shoes</strong></a> Gray Pink Shoes can keep your feet in the freest condition,just as if your were barefooted. <strong>vibram five fingers kso shoes </strong>is made of the best and proper materials,so you don't need to doubt of its comfort with so thin sole and upper. Gray match with a dreamlike and romantic color,pink<a href="http://www.vibramfivefingers.name" rel="nofollow"><strong> vibram five fingers kso shoes</strong></a> is very consistent with the style of young girls.In this busy and tense times,people need relax without any fetter. Women’s vibram five fingers kso shoes Gray Pink Shoes can keep your feet in the freest condition,just as if your were barefooted. vibram five fingers kso shoes is made of the best and proper materials,so you don’t need to doubt of its comfort with so thin sole and upper.
Gray match with a dreamlike and romantic color,pink vibram five fingers kso shoes is very consistent with the style of young girls.In this busy and tense times,people need relax without any fetter.

]]> By: JavaBlogging » Beautiful casting gone bad http://www.javablogging.com/type_safety_in_java_set_and_map/comment-page-1/#comment-859 JavaBlogging » Beautiful casting gone bad Mon, 02 Nov 2009 12:02:11 +0000 http://www.javablogging.com/?p=3#comment-859 [...] Even the code in lines 10-13 will not result in a exception! Due to many factors (see posts about map type safety and checked set) the error will wait until line 14 to crash your application. The stack trace you [...] [...] Even the code in lines 10-13 will not result in a exception! Due to many factors (see posts about map type safety and checked set) the error will wait until line 14 to crash your application. The stack trace you [...]

]]> By: JavaBlogging » Type Safety: why would you need a Collections.checkedSet? http://www.javablogging.com/type_safety_in_java_set_and_map/comment-page-1/#comment-354 JavaBlogging » Type Safety: why would you need a Collections.checkedSet? Wed, 09 Sep 2009 14:53:17 +0000 http://www.javablogging.com/?p=3#comment-354 [...] one of the first posts on this blog I have discussed the problem of type checking (or lack of it) in some of Java [...] [...] one of the first posts on this blog I have discussed the problem of type checking (or lack of it) in some of Java [...]

]]> By: jkilgrow http://www.javablogging.com/type_safety_in_java_set_and_map/comment-page-1/#comment-22 jkilgrow Mon, 06 Jul 2009 12:21:13 +0000 http://www.javablogging.com/?p=3#comment-22 @Shams - DING! I was thinking the same thing! Unit tests should have caught this type of thing and is the very reason to write them! Spend the time up front and make your unit tests meaningful not just so that your code passes code coverage! @Shams – DING! I was thinking the same thing! Unit tests should have caught this type of thing and is the very reason to write them! Spend the time up front and make your unit tests meaningful not just so that your code passes code coverage!

]]> By: Jenna http://www.javablogging.com/type_safety_in_java_set_and_map/comment-page-1/#comment-10 Jenna Tue, 23 Jun 2009 22:59:42 +0000 http://www.javablogging.com/?p=3#comment-10 Pretty good post. I just came across your blog and wanted to say that I've really enjoyed browsing your blog posts. Anyway I'll be subscribing to your feed and I hope you write again soon! Pretty good post. I just came across your blog and wanted to say
that I’ve really enjoyed browsing your blog posts. Anyway
I’ll be subscribing to your feed and I hope you write again soon!

]]> By: keccs http://www.javablogging.com/type_safety_in_java_set_and_map/comment-page-1/#comment-9 keccs Mon, 22 Jun 2009 17:52:00 +0000 http://www.javablogging.com/?p=3#comment-9 You might want to try FindBugs, it finds this and a million other bugs. And it's free. You might want to try FindBugs, it finds this and a million other bugs.
And it’s free.

]]> By: cva http://www.javablogging.com/type_safety_in_java_set_and_map/comment-page-1/#comment-8 cva Sun, 21 Jun 2009 21:22:20 +0000 http://www.javablogging.com/?p=3#comment-8 Generics moronicity. <a href="http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.java.programmer/browse_frm/thread/6f685999f632617b/d88c721bf8b444c4?pli=1" rel="nofollow">http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.java.programmer/</a> Generics moronicity.

http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.java.programmer/

]]> By: admin http://www.javablogging.com/type_safety_in_java_set_and_map/comment-page-1/#comment-7 admin Sun, 21 Jun 2009 20:34:47 +0000 http://www.javablogging.com/?p=3#comment-7 Yeah, UnitTests rock:) Yeah, UnitTests rock:)

]]> By: ppow http://www.javablogging.com/type_safety_in_java_set_and_map/comment-page-1/#comment-6 ppow Fri, 19 Jun 2009 14:12:53 +0000 http://www.javablogging.com/?p=3#comment-6 Thanks for that info Chris! I have to check this out, it would be very helpful! Thanks for that info Chris! I have to check this out, it would be very helpful!

]]> By: Shams http://www.javablogging.com/type_safety_in_java_set_and_map/comment-page-1/#comment-5 Shams Fri, 19 Jun 2009 14:12:25 +0000 http://www.javablogging.com/?p=3#comment-5 Having unit tests for the classes would have saved you all the effort. ;) Having unit tests for the classes would have saved you all the effort. ;)

]]>